X Force Keygen Showcase 2006 Download
Download File > https://bltlly.com/2t83vZ
The main uportal web site is maintained by HyperContent, and is mostly very static.A lot of work has been done recently on the web site.They're trying to make a facebook, so that visitors would be able to see the people filling various roles in the uPortal community.There had been no form or link to send email to anybody, so they did that.There is now a photo gallery; intended for photos from meetings etc.There has been some talk about using a common layout, analogous to what the JA-SIG CAS site has.There is now a site developer.ja-sig.org; it has a link to the FishEye (repository management) software, and other things of developer interest.As of Friday, March 24, 2006, the site is now at the Princeton clearinghouse machine (used to be at the University of Delaware).There is now an RSS feed to post uPortal news.The most dynamic part of the site is when someone wants to make a new release of something, and put a link to where to download it.John has not yet made docs for how to use HyperContent to add content to this site.He migrated most of the existing documentation over to the wiki.The thing that is needed next, is to get a list of who is implementing and who is in production.[a bug was brought up re the move to Princeton: if you go to "uportal.org" you don't get the same thing as "www.uportal.org"]John took on the Ja-sig conferences site as well. It is a webapp written in Java, and needs some overhauling.There should be more of a single signon solution for all the JA-SIG stuff (which is in several sites).Bill T: There has been some discussion of this in the CAS project.Eric D: We are trying to get Confluence and Jira sync'ed at least.John: The HyperContent site is already using the same userid database as the uPortal Jira.Jason: Someone needs to find the time to do this. e.g. there is no clear owner of the Clearinghouse uPortal instance.Susan B: Has the developer part of the site been officially announced? Didn't know about it.There needs to be better linkage to it.Dan Mindler: Tried to structure stuff under 'developer' starting about 6 months ago; now it may be time to make it better known.Jason: There is a Google Group about JA-SIG; actually it was started by people working on the JA-SIG website to discuss improvements to it. Let's make a part of web presence that is more about marketing/why should you use uPortal. -webpresence
Dan M: Rutgers' focus for 2.4.x was on stability and performance rather than new features.Faizan: Was the chart from the Baltimore conference on the wall helpful? [The 'wave' let each site subjectively indicate how far along it was in adoption and acceptance of uPortal]John F: We should have something on the web site that keeps track of this. Could we have a release-specific support list?Bill T: Because Ken was doing everything, what the roles were was not clear. Maybe there should be someone in charge of keeping track of the downloads page, and of who is running which release.Eric: Unlike on other open source sites, [e.g. Apache], we haven't been saying, "We recommend you use version x.y.z".Jonathan M: We don't want the lack of such information to limit adoption.Faizan: Maybe have an 'adoption' session at the conference?Faizan: For us 2.4.x is really stable, the fact that we are leaving it doesn't mean it's no good, we don't want to give that impression.Eric: But there's an advantage to having everybody on the same release. We want to be careful what we say to potential adoptees Jonathan M: We need to say what we recommend and how we position the other branches.Mike Z: We should have an official policy that we will support X releases back but if someone wants to work on something earlier, that's okay.Bill T: Create a community where the path of least resistance is to move forward. Rather say "The board or community leaders will endeavor to find release engineers for X releases back."Jonathan M: I don't know what the correct number of releases is, but that's the right message.Jason: One reason that people use open source is that commercial vendors keep pushing them forward in releases.Jan N: For example Tomcat, there's 3.x, 4.x, 5.0 and 5.5. The driving force is whether there are enough people using a given release that there can be support for each other.Dan M: We aren't anticipating any new minor releases for 2.4.x. 2b1af7f3a8